research-grants
Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.
Author
Category
Content CreationInstall
Download and extract to your skills directory
Copy command and send to OpenClaw for auto-install:
Research Grant Writing - Research Grant Proposal Writing Assistant
Skill Overview
A professional research grant proposal writing tool that supports the application requirements of major funding agencies including NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan's NSTC. It provides comprehensive writing guidance for project abstracts, research strategy, budgeting, broader impacts statements, and more.
Applicable Scenarios
Draft NSF research project proposals (including CAREER Award, EAGER, RAPID, etc.), NIH R01/R21/R03 applications, DOE energy research programs, DARPA technical proposals, covering everything from project abstracts to detailed research strategies.
Support for early-career faculty applying for CAREER Awards, postdocs and independent researchers applying for F-series/K-series grants, multi-institution collaborative project budgeting, and integration of interdisciplinary research proposals.
Analyze reviewer comments and develop resubmission strategies, strengthen preliminary data and feasibility arguments, improve Specific Aims and descriptions of research methods, and supplement broader impacts or innovation statements.
Core Features
Automatically adapts to the different requirements of NSF (dual review of intellectual merit + broader impacts), NIH (three-dimensional scoring: significance/innovation/approach), DARPA (high-risk, high-reward orientation), and NSTC (CM03 form, evaluation of innovation/feasibility/value), generating project descriptions and specific aims that comply with each agency's guidelines.
Supports drafting project abstracts/executive summaries, Specific Aims pages (including hypothesis testing and sub-goals), research strategy (significance/innovation/approach), budget justification and staffing, timelines and milestone planning, collaborator team qualifications, and required broader impacts or societal significance statements.
Requires each proposal to include 1–2 AI-generated scientific schematics (via the scientific-schematics capability). It can automatically generate publication-quality diagrams such as research method flowcharts, project Gantt charts, conceptual framework diagrams, preliminary data visualizations, and collaboration network maps to enhance proposal persuasiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I apply for funding without preliminary data?
It depends on the funding agency and the mechanism. NIH R01s typically require substantial preliminary data to demonstrate feasibility; exploratory mechanisms like R21/R03 have more relaxed preliminary data requirements; most standard NSF proposals do not strictly require preliminary data, though high-risk innovative approaches benefit from feasibility data; DARPA and NSTC both place high value on preliminary evidence. This tool can help identify which mechanisms suit different data baselines and guide how to effectively present existing data.
What is the difference between NSF's Broader Impacts and NIH's Significance?
NSF's Broader Impacts is an independent review dimension weighted equally with intellectual merit and must specifically explain how the research will promote education, diversity, infrastructure, science communication, or societal benefits, with clear activities, timelines, and evaluation methods. NIH's Significance focuses on the importance of the research question to scientific knowledge or clinical practice, emphasizing how it fills knowledge gaps, improves health outcomes, and aligns with the institute's mission. This tool provides differentiated templates and writing strategies tailored to both agencies.
How do I write a good DARPA proposal?
DARPA emphasizes "what happens if successful" (impact) and "why it matters" (national security relevance), favoring high-risk, high-reward proposals with prototype demonstration and a clear path to transition. Proposals should include clear technical milestones, quarterly deliverables, a risk management plan, and exit criteria. This tool includes DARPA-specific structural guidelines, including how to craft a technical challenge statement, write a phased execution plan, and highlight team execution capability.